BEERS: Issues Reporting - Please Post Here for modifications

Added this as a stout due to going with UT. It is a sour.

https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/great-beyond-coffee-and-caramelised-orange-peel-stout/1065202/

Is it a flavor because it has adjuncts? or could it still be a dry stout with subtle fruit from adjucts? Most of the reviews speak more of the characters as dry stout than that of a stout - flavored/pastry.

It says it’s a sour on untappd and I can’t find any other pictures, post or references to it labeling. Do you have one?

Was sat right next to the bar so didn’t taken a photo of the board. I did discuss the beer with thebguy on the bar and it is a sour. The confusion was that someone must have made a typo and added stout to the name on UT instead of sour. I then presumed tbe style was the part that was incorrect.

1 Like

Looks like someone typo’d entry because if you search it says [

Coffee & Caramelised Orange Peel Sout

Then someone must have edited Sout to be Stout instead of Sour

1 Like

We seem to in a bit of mess with the Latvian brewer Uzavas https://www.ratebeer.com/brewers/uzavas-alus/4966/ due to them down naming their export bottles in English (with no reference to the Latvian name).

I believe these two beers are the same
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/uzavas-baltic-dark/609229/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/uzavas-ziemelu-alus/603017/

Also Uzavas Gaisais is now called “Light Beer” on export bottles
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/uzavas-gaisais/37181/
And Uzavas Tumsais is “Dark Beer”.
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/uzavas-tumsais/37270/

Ideally these last two need to be aliased.
[ I can upload photos of bottles with english labelling if required ]

1 Like

Hi,

Dupe:

https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/cervezas-la-sagra-castiza/980756/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/la-sagra-castiza-premium/154615/

1 Like

This one is actually called Woolly Bugger https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/izaak-walton-wolly-bugger/1067676/

1 Like

Oops, yes, so it is ! I was concentrating on spelling the second word correctly 


1 Like

Same beer:

https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/dougall-s-duo2-hbc586-cryo-pop/1055241/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/duo-hbc-586-cryo-pop/1048097/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/cerveza-dougall-s/1048071/

https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/cerveza-dougall-s-india-imperial-porter/1007239/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/india-imperial-porter/1004245/

Thanks,

1 Like

When you search for “Victoria Malaga” you get hits for the following two beers (only)
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/victoria-malaga-1928/641412/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/victoria-malaga-1928/145921/

However, the first beer says that, depending on the size of can / bottle the beer came in, it might be the following beer instead
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/estrella-levante-victoria-1928/107261/

Unfortunately, I had it on tap ! No-one seems to have rated any of these beers on tap. Which beer did I have ?

2 Likes

Beat me to that one.

I don’t know, what beer did you have?

Since you had it on tap, things like location you had it, photos of beer list/taps/pump clips and anything else would really help admin out.

Having investigatedf further, I think it’s the first one 641412 as the pump clip is the same as the bottle label for that one. And what I had was 4.8% which rules out the Levante one. I’ll post a review when I get home

If you’ve had it recently, you’ve had the new regular Victoria 4.8% one. I think that the Levante one existed before the new Victoria brewery was built and subsequently got killed off. Not sure when the descriptions were added, but they may be as much as 4 years old - when the change to 4.8% happened.

This will likely result in all post-2017 or post mid-2018 beers being moved to the Victoria entry and the Estrella one getting shut down.

1 Like

OK, I’ve now submitted my review - to the Victoria one. I would suggest the Grupo Damm one https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/victoria-malaga-1928/145921/ is a duplicate and needs to be merged. (it only has 1 review)

https://www.ratebeer.com/brewers/barrique-brewing-and-blending/38721/

These guys have 5 beers with brewery name “Barrique and blending”, obviously wrong.

This is flavored:

https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/farm-yard-ales-f-k-cancer-beer-project-you-had-a-busy-day-today/1068077/

This is just called Waken, the Cloudy is from the sub-title.

https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/kent-cider-waken-cloudy/838598/

Pilgrim’s new fundraising lager is clearly a rebadge of Somers. Exactly the same description for both beers.

https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/pilgrim-benevolence-lager/1069041/

https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/pilgrim-somers/825599/

This is a Pale Ale - Belgian:

https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/omnipollo-octave/1060424/

This is a series with different hops. One has been added with no hop specified. If it is indeed the version with the yellow forklift then this is the Wai-iti version:

https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/jawbone-highs-and-lows/962607/

This is Cider - Flavored:

https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/sandford-orchards-berry-lane/561781/

This beer should be listed under Glen Cannich:

https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/glen-cannich-harr-hazy-pale/1064699/

1 Like

I know the descriptions are the same, but why are they selling them both at the same time?

image

Yes, it was the first one made; this happens when they don’t originally specify the first in a series
yatta yatta

1 Like