I have allocated points for the top 50 raters of beers from each English region (50 points for the person who has rated the most beers for the region down to 1 point for the 50th placed person). This gives the same amount of points for 32 rates in Rutland as for 3711 Greater London rates. As I last did this a while ago I have included the change, like a top 40 count down…
Well the biggest poptastic mover in the charts this week is the frankly fantabulous ChrisO who climbs a mega monstrous 12 places, how pop diddly doodle tastic is that.
This made me lose 50th place in Gloucestershire rates
No big achievement but I’m much newer than all you lot so I was proud to finally break a top 50 somewhere only to get moved back down to 51st just a couple of days later lol.
It is … Cgarvieuk
And that is why i think it is a bit odd that we have ticked beers as privat (hidden) but it they still count and nobody is just not allowed to see what value a people give a beer.
@fonefan (note @ before the person send them a note that they have been mentioned)
Yeah, im not sure i like the private bit. where info is hidden. I think its all still work in progress. SO lets see where this goes
I don’t think they count towards the beer’s rating though do they? In that case I think it’s ok for them to stay private but IF it does count towards the average rating it should be public.
But for example I see currently fonefan has 3094 ticks but all of them say non-qualified. So I think this means they don’t count towards the average and only he can see the score.
EDIT: Ok I think I misunderstood at first. I guess they DO count as a rating but it does NOT affect the average score of the beer. But for the purpose of these stats tables it does seem a little unfair.
@LazyPyro
My 3094 ticks definitely counts in my Avg Score Given so therefore i can only assume it also will affect other places in the stats also …
So i see the point in having a private rating (not showing your review txt).
But with giving a beer a score and then not make it public and still make it affect the avg score i do not see the point.
Yeah Joe claimed in the latest Friday missive that he’d corrected the counts in about 50 different places on the website, I assume much of this was stats tables that were incorrectly including ticks.
EDIT: Yes, can confirm Joe did fix this. I haven’t had any Gloucestershire beers this week yet I’ve now jumped up to 47th in the Gloucestershire rates table… Finally I have broken a top 50 somewhere. Now to catch up everywhere else
The art of getting into the top 50 of a county quickly is choosing the correct one/ones; Rutland, Isle of Wight and Surrey being the easiest beer total wise (I think), Shropshire is another easy hit too.
Good luck.
<*))))))><
PS. You are miles in front of me with Gloucestershire already.
I have had 8 beers from the IoW. That is equal to the guy at 33 in the IoW rating list, but I am listed as 40th. Do I get classed as equal 33rd for the IoW or 40th?
I keep it basic, based on the place each person appears in the list of each regions top 50. That way i can copy and past each list into a single spreadsheet and run it through a basic pivot table.
This means you’d be 40th rather than equal 33rd. Sorry, but it keeps it simple for me…