I know it’s title says ‘Raters’, but the lists do not include anyone who only ‘ticks’. Shropshire for example does not show @AndyTF2 who has over 450 ‘ticks’ to his name but no ‘rates’.
Asking if it is worth mentioning, just to bulk out those stat lists in general?
Yes and no … so someone has taken the time to rate beers and chase top 50 county spots to suddenly be dumped out overnight by including tickers.
How would you like that ?
Some folks take those top 50 county spots quite seriously.
Way ahead would be default to raters only … toggle switch to turn tickers on / off if you wished.
Ah … you mean based in a region Jeremy.
Yes - I see no problems with that at present bearing in mind the active users in the UK but this could bump active raters out of highly populated regions such as California.
I have no problem with that but insist that any changes should not apply to Surrey.
It does randomly apply as to which stats ticks apply to. I appear in breweries and regions but not rater numbers. I’d like it to be able to toggle between to.
I’d definitely appear in Top 50 in quite a few UK counties.
Worth keeping note but I guessing most of effort going into spliiting countries at present