Looks like I added a duplicate, sorry: https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/la-sirene-sour-iso-ale/825843/ was earlier added as https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/la-sirene-sour-iso-ale/824315/ It is sour and has got fruit in it, though.
1 Like
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/polly-s-brew-bring-back-the-fever/823012/
Situation here is this beer has been renamed for very obvious reasons. Youāll notice the only ratings so far are from Norwegiansā¦ according to Pollyās, due to contractual obligations they had to send a lot of cases for Vinmonopolet there before they could relabel all the beers. I donāt think it got released in the UK and other markets under this label.
New name: Pollyās Brew No Track Info
description:
Links for proof:
mailing list announcing the decision to rename: https://mailchi.mp/b3e8a3cdf0d5/update-bring-back-the-fever (also explains the old labels existing in the Norwegian market)
fb post announcing the new name: Redirecting...
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/brewski-green-bench-keyser-gose/445243/ is at the wrong brewery. Should be at Brewski Sweden, not Brewsy Brewing Co in the US.
1 Like
Seems like this should probably be aliased rather than renamed.
Good point. Iāll add it later and someone can sort out the aliasing and moving of ratings.
In the meantime hereās an actual rename and description:
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/unbarred-dip-le-donut/819737/
Itās a collab so name should be: UnBarred / Staggeringly Good Dip Le Donut
and description:
I added this beer but couldnāt be bothered to type up the spiel on the bottle. An Admin had looked up the details and obviously concluded that the beer was brewed at Vibrant Forest (theyāve taken the description from the VB webshop). It definitely wasnāt - I happened to visit Elusiveās tap when the Vibrant Forest guys were there brewing it just prior to lockdown.
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/vibrant-forest-elusive-anomalous-materials/825397/
1 Like
Just adding some beers I ordered and I pressed enter too quickly on this oneā¦
Should be called: Your Coconuts Offend Me
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/mad-yank-a-hoppy-place/826508
I also note that all the beers that were already on there had the brewery missing from the name:
https://www.ratebeer.com/brewers/mad-yank-brewery/39294/
And just gone to rate another beer I added about a week ago and I fucked that up as well. This should be called: Youāll Shoot Your Eye Out.
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/j-wakefield-boneflower/824581/
Seeing as Low Alcohol - Dark is now upon us:
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/original-small-beer-dark-lager/597526/414177/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/big-drop-stout/579682/414177/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/brewdog-nanny-state-05/117796/414177/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/st-peters-without-original/465809/414177/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/big-drop-brewdog-cambridge-the-nutty-professor/777922/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/big-drop-fourpure-big-river-black-ipa/795780/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/big-drop-galactic-milk-stout/819341/
How dark is dark? These arenāt pale:
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/istak-malt-natural/80806/414177/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/delster-classic-na/55124/414177/
These are also low alcohol dark:
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/steiger-dark-free/161234/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/cerveja-super-bock-preta-sem-alcool/70133/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/black-delster/75463/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/niigata-beer-zero-zero-black/803932/
And this (classified as a stout at the moment):
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/svyturys-go-juodas-nealkoholinis-stout/513349/
1 Like
Cheers for the changes.
Was the issue with the beer names I added something to do with digits available for beer names being reduced or did I dream that?
The problem with Istak and Delster is that Iām not sure that they are meant to be dark - they just sometimes are. 
Iām seeing the same two looking very, very pale as well on some pictures. I wouldnāt touch them personally.
2 Likes
This is not a beer, itās someoneās failed attempt to add a place:
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/continental-wine-and-food/768202/
Not in production any more:
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/camden-town-versus-mohawk-black-ipl/283782/
I would argue that is is not an India Dark Lager (brewer calls it a dunkel with coffee, reviews here donāt really mention hoppiness much):
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/braybrooke-cold-brew-lager/724971/
1 Like
Thanks for making those changes!
These two should be upgraded to imperial red (is it a ānewā style here?):
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/founders-backstage-series-13-redankulous-imperial-red-ipa/354786/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/oskar-blues-g-knight-imperial-red-ipa/16961/
Also, this beer was boosted to 8% ABV at some point (info from untappd and various Russian beer websites, unfortunately I donāt know when), which would make it an imperial red, too:
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/victory-art-brew-red-sails-ipa/339208/
So the question is, do we retire it and make a new entry for the imperial version, or do we change the old version (style + ABV) and make a note about this in the description?
None of these beers should have the style changed. They are al Red IPAs so according to the new style definition Session and Imperial Red IPAs remain as Red IPAs. Itās then confusing that there is an Imperial Red Ale style - but, as per an explanation further up in the thread, there were apparently enough Imperial Red Ales to justify a seperate style but not enough Imperial Red IPAs for them to be split out.
2 Likes
Under the new style definitions thse should be IPA - Reds:
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/little-earth-project-red-tripa/649309/414177/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/jopen-mars-rover/741010/414177/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/the-answer-bloody-malth/719527/414177/
And these should be IPA - Flavored:
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/three-floyds-battle-of-charro-ii/540291/414177/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/siren-americano-project-barista-2017/525571/414177/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/pipeworks-scarlet-betta/361041/414177/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/partizan-beer52-rowan-tree-dipa/582457/414177/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/siren-hill-farmstead-limoncello-5th-birthday-edition/602407/414177/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/mccolls-hedgerow-dipa/644985/414177/
And IPA - Belgian:
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/cloudwater-belgian-ipa/616286/414177/
1 Like
These all appear to be Smoked - Other rather than Rauchbiers, i.e theyāre not based on the Bamberg original or other traditional German styles:
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/torrside-monsters-perfect-circle/665903/414177/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/butchers-tears-smoke-mirrors/347870/414177/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/red-cat-untamed-range-smoggy/374822/414177/
And these are smoked Brown Ales so again seems tenuous to me?
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/black-iris-torrside-bury-me-in-smoke/606928/414177/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/anspach-hobday-the-smoked-brown/249268/414177/
1 Like
Please combine two identical beers this https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/volynskiy-brovar-wheat-apa-american-ale/779464/ with https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/volynskiy-brovar-wheat-apa/750673/
1 Like
Two that need their styles correcting to the new āPerry - Ice/Fortifiedā style:
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/dragon-orchard-the-wonder-dessert-perry-bottle/140798/223863/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/genussbauernhof-distelberger-pyrus-glacialis-eisbirne-no-1/596360/
2 Likes
These beers are missing their full names:
Should be Triptych #1 Progenitor
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/triple-point-le-trou-du-diable-triptych-1/815158/414177/
Then:
#2 Vinator
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/triple-point-le-trou-du-diable-triptych-2/815156/
#3 Collaborator
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/triple-point-le-trou-du-diable-triptych-3/815155/
#3 is a blend of the Pils and Saison so has been added as a Saison - Flavored. However the bottle still states Pilsener.
