https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/land-and-labour-lunarberry/791622/
Correct Name: Land and Labour Lúnaberry
Thanks.
1 Like
A couple of duplicates I reported last month, still here.
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/northern-monk-patrons-project-22-01-black-friday/789503/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/northern-monk-good-measure-patrons-project-22-01-independent-north/801088/
First one is all correct nothing needs changing. Second one is wrong because Good Measure is a clothes shop not a brewery. And “Independent North” is the name of series 22 of the Patrons Project beers, not the name of the beer, which is “Black Friday”. Given the number of ratings on it it’s probably best to leave as an alias and move the ratings over.
And a similar situation:
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/northern-monk-alex-beecroft-patrons-project-23-01-lights-out/787567/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/northern-monk-patrons-project-23-01-homebrew-heroes/801188/
Again, first one is the correct entry. The beer is a collaboration with a homebrewer (Alex Beecroft) therefore (I think?) his name is fine to include in name of the beer, I’m 99% sure I’ve seen this done with other beers in the past, but if not then remove it. And “Lights Out” is the actual name of the beer, “Homebrew Heroes” is the name of series 23.
1 Like
Just seen these two beers, they are the same beer which was in the alpine beer52 pack. The correct beer is the Italian one.
It might even have been me that added the other version.
1 Like
This To Øl beer is the same as the To Øl CPH version.
Seems like same beer to me
Edit:
And another one
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/efes-extra-strong/153505/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/efes-extra-shot/794246/
Edit 2:
Is this really a new entry?
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/sierra-nevada-dogfish-head-life-and-limb-3rd-2019/806273/
1 Like
Please mark these three beers as retired. The brewery has just released new versions of each made according to different recipes (info from their page on Facebook).
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/tsypa-double-kopchena/470520/
1 Like
Carton the Hook
This one:
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/carton-the-hook/806771/
is a duplicate of this one:
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/carton-the-hook/709808/
1 Like
Done.
https://www.ratebeer.com/brewers/little-monster-brewing/35697/
Both of these beers should have ‘brewed at’ set to Missing Link (this one https://www.ratebeer.com/brewers/missing-link-brewing/31715/). You can verify this as the can labels are visible on their website here https://littlemonsterbrew.com/year-round-beers/
1 Like
I made twice the same typo entering this beer:
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/de-maar-limburgs-klimcriterium-biertje-koversberg/810443
In the the title and the description: Korversberg, not Koversberg.
1 Like
Done
1 Like
Impy to flavoured impy
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/sierra-nevada-trip-in-the-woods-barrel-aged-cocoa-coconut-narwhal/556915/296471/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/carton-sundae/508517/296471/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/whiskerbeer-deer-bear-nutcracker/478313/296471/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/omnipollo-buxton-yellow-belly-peanut-butter-biscuit-stout/280975/296471/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/hoof-hearted-barrel-aged-girth-brooks/667004/296471/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/hoof-hearted-evil-twin-even-more-tennis-elbow/775294/296471/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/boundary-zapato-youre-not-getting-any/543359/296471/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/mont-saleve-tzarine-framboise/415422/296471/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/pipeworks-mocha-abduction/264440/296471/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/deer-bear-candy-shop-maple-pie-with-hint-of-cinammon/603320/296471/
Isn’t the whole point of this beer that it tastes like peanut butter biscuits, but doesn’t actually have any in it?
I changed the rest.
1 Like
How is that possible? What sorcery is that?
To clarify - that beer has adjuncts written all over it. OK, they didn’t use any peanut butter or biscuits but where does the intensive peanut aroma and flavor come from? Omnipollo is known for using artificial flavors in beer and not exactly disclosing it. Which brings us to another problem - if brewer doesn’t disclose ingredients how are we going to know if it’s flavoured?
Maybe infer from the flavor? I sure as heck would want to know if something tasted like peanut butter!
Generally, one could infer from the name, but here the brewer is explicitly saying that no biscuits or peanuts were involved. From what I can say, there was no explicit representation that no adjuncts were used, but there was an explicit representation that none of the most likely adjuncts were used. I think, to stay on the safe side, this should not be considered flavored until we have verifiable evidence that adjuncts were used. Generally brewers state the adjuncts, especially for imperial stouts.
UK Admins: this appears to be a kveik IPA but is listed as a Brut. Is there any reason it shouldn’t be reclassified as IPA or Session IPA until there is a kveik category?
Most of these still need changing. Just click that link and search speedway. All the ones that aren’t flavoured should be
Done!
