https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/lervig-shiga-kogen-yuzu-raga/789824/
This is a lager (pilsner) flavoured with Yuzu juice, not a pale ale. In the absence of a Lager - Flavored style I would say this is perhaps better suited under the catch-all Flavored - Fruit style? Looking at my own rated styles it seems all other fruited lagers are in this one.
Also minor thing but Raga should be spelt Ragā.
This was forgotten. Please check 
Check #14, think you copied the previous beer’s description for that.
Also here’s another
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/deya-magazine-cover/813096/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/north-brewing-co-thornbridge-dopplebock/808556/
My bad, misspelled Doppelbock in the beer name (copied and pasted their own mistake, to be fair)
Fixed all three.
Dugges Tropic Punch is the exact same beer as Dugges Tropic Thunder just rebranded for the US market.
Here’s an easy one A ‘w’ needs to be added so this reads HURST VIEW.
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/hurst-vie-white-lady-1651-reserve-dry/815045/
Also, this should read: HEIST CRAFT - I’VE GONE FULL BOYLE https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/heist-craft-brew-heist-ive-gone-full/815057
This should be DELIRIUM BLOND BARREL AGED, to differentiate from the Delirium Black barrel-aged.
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/delirium-barrel-aged/802010/
Looks like this beer is different hops this time around, so I am adding a new entry, can an admin please change the old one:
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/river-north-hopatronic-lupulsitor/762612/
To River North Hopatronic Lupulsitor (Mosaic, Simcoe & Idaho 7)
Style Should also be updated to IIPA - Imperial Hazy / NEIPA
Evidence for the change: https://www.brewbound.com/news/river-north-brewery-to-release-hop-a-tronic
Here’s the new one:
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/river-north-hopatronic-lupulsitor-galaxy-and-sabro/815093
Thanks!
This is made by Celtic Marches, not Purity
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/purity-celtic-marches-pure-cider/719823/
Could an admin please create a new tag “harlequin” for the relatively new English hop: https://www.charlesfaram.co.uk/product/harlequin/
I generally tag all the pales I drink with the hops they use and I added a beer the other day single hopped with Harlequin and realised there’s no tag for it yet. A quick Google search reveals a handful more beers have used it so I will tag as many as I can find once added. Thanks in advance.
Done
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/northern-monk-cloudwater-deya-verdant-wylam-hop-city-ddh-ipa/706975/
This one can be retired. It’s an annual release, different beer each year. I’ve added the 2020 version which was just released
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/north-brewing-co-track-wylam-lmn-lds-mcr-ncl/590967/
and https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/wylam-north-brewing-co-track-nlm/744659/
Similar reason as above, both can be retired as the third and final beer is now out.
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/overtone-big-joe/796130/
change to stout - imperial flavored (maple and coffee)
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/pressure-drop-escape-pod-cherry-edition/805815/
change to stout - imperial flavored (cherry, coconut, cocoa, vanilla)
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/northern-monk-rapscallion/396660/
rebrewed this year and now marketed as an “orange zest IPA”. iirc it still contains ginger too so suggesting it be changed to IPA - Flavored.
This beer should not be aliased (anymore).
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/hogs-back-little-swine/707617/
The original was cask only and brewed at Tilford basically because Hogs Back didn’t have the capacity for a test run at their own brewery - it was subsequently released with different names by both breweries. However once the beer proved popular Hogs Back then started to brew it themselves. Although the Tilford version has been retired all the rating are then appearing under that beer because it’s still aliased. Basically this beer s should be unaliased and then all the recent ratings moved over - other than my rating it looks like maybe only one is for the original beer.
(Or has it gone wrong when someone already tried to change the alias as the links won’t work?)
Rapscallion is a complicated case. The original description (from 2016 I assume), mentions all UK hops.
Later version(s) mention that it’s an IPA, which it didn’t before, and use Citra, Simcoe, Comet, Centennial. Now, the issue is finding out when the split occurred and split the entry.
Edit - all sorted out:
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/northern-monk-rapscallion-2019-/816113/
I thought it sounded a bit different when I was adding my rating there but didn’t bother to look into it. Seems so obvious now. Cheers for sorting it out.
Here’s some more stuff:
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/arbor-yakima-chief-hbc-522/816814/
Style to New England IPA, written on the can label and pump clip
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/track-wander-beyond-perseus/796330/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/burnt-mill-lights-on-the-hill/812829/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/wild-beer-b-a-b-s-ii-2/797510/
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/untitled-art-florida-weisse-batch-3/658888/
This is a collab, should be named “Untitled Art / Wild Mind Florida Weisse (Version 3)” as is written on the can, not sure “3+” makes sense as I get the impression they switch up the fruits in each one.
I’m not sure where the current description is from, possibly from BA, but it conflicts with what the brewery claims is in it so I suspect that’s actually a description for v1/v2 but I couldn’t find it anywhere else to confirm.
Anyway, description the brewery gave for v3 from an Instagram post:
This is a Bushy’s beer - it says so on the bottle. It should not be a Gibralter tick.
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/bushys-gibraltar-barbary-beer/34014/
Fremont HFOD #16 / v 16:
This: https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/fremont-head-full-of-dynamite-v-16-ekuanot-idaho-7-mosaic/807037/
is a duplicate of this:
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/fremont-head-full-of-dynomite-16-eukanot-mosaic-and-idaho-7/804133/
Also, for the last 2 in the HFOD series ( the duplicate of 16 and 17) are using the “v” vs the first 16 entires which us the “#” format.
https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/bacchus-kriekenbier/82497/645346/
This one is a Kriek, a lambic fruited.
No it is not. Flemish Old Brown as base and with cherries. Not a lambic at all. Sour - Fruited probably.
" Bacchus Kriekenbier is a fruit beer based on Bacchus Oud Vlaams Bruin (Old Flemish Brown) with the addition of krieks (Morello cherries). The production process is similar to that of the St. Louis fruit beers (also in the hands of Castle Brewery Van Honsebrouck).
However, with St. Louis fruit beers, the fruit is maturing on gueuze-lambiek instead of Oud Vlaams Bruin."
Yes, I was wrong.
2000- 2017 © RateBeer, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
